Security: The new priority for IT projects


A survey report says that privacy could be gradually at the top-of-the-line for many organizations, but many organizations remain unhappy with their current role on that issue. According to the findings of a recent study, several businesses are seeking to keep up and improve technology inclusion in their growth cycle and cloud deployment strategies. The State of Modern Enterprise Apps report indicates that 78% of respondents viewed technology convergence as a core priority in more IT ventures and activities, ranking third behind meeting market requirements faster and providing better quality apps faster. Requirements to be counted by respondents included feedback on IT budget, emphasis on application growth, and work in IT, product management, or creation.

While the idea of DevSecOps continues to gather traction, Ahead’s Tim Curless, Chief Architect, certain organizations may need to widen the olive branch on behalf of protection Security practice may be broken down, he states, in organizations with some partners hesitant to make defense part of expansion plans. “Security is often seen as a cost center or not worth the money until it’s a little too late.” In other words, the importance of protection is often not perceived until after an event happens that reveals that it’s important. If treated properly, he says that protection can be a smooth feature in the life cycle.

Part of the evolving landscape, Pydyn says, entails displaying leadership within organizations that security is an essential commodity. The plan should also ensure that developers have resources dedicated to security tasks to ensure that they engage in projects that show this value. With several organizations focusing on integrated integration, Curless claims that protection will become an afterthought through the transition as businesses rely on static and complex analysis methods and processes. Path companies preferring to exploit the cloud will also impact their strategy’s short-term and long-term consequences.

Curless says the raise and change strategy can be a way for companies to claim they’re getting on board with the cloud, but it can ignore possibilities for alternative approaches, such as being cloud-native. Another factor to note is accessibility in the application stack, says Pydyn, since legacy applications can become quite invisible by lift and change. They might still get the job done, but it leaves some unrealized opportunities that could have been helpful.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here